|
|
|
|
|
by bhouston
2887 days ago
|
|
If Intel goes multi-chip in the same package like Ryzen, then yeah, they can get more cores in, similar to Ryzen Threadripper. So there is a leap coming for Intel as well if they go that route, and after the massive success of Ryzen, they are likely going there. Just easier to scale core counts if you can use smaller dies and just use a lot of them with an interconnect fabric. |
|
1. Relentless process improvement, putting them 1-2 generations ahead of everyone else.
2. Using their monopoly to prevent OEMs from shipping AMD processors.
#1 isn't true anymore.
#2 is almost irrelevant since mobile has taken over and makes the PC revolution look like child's play by comparison.
Intel doesn't have a good graphics story. They sell hot power-hungry chips. They no longer have a process advantage. Their monopoly in x86 is increasingly (but not yet completely) irrelevant.
I'm sure they can ride the x86 profitability horse for at least 5-10 years. What then? Remember: RIM was profitable for several years after the iPhone was released. That didn't save them. Microsoft continued to rake in cash with Windows/Office as iOS/Android/AWS/GC established a new world order that threatened to make them irrelevant.