|
|
|
|
|
by lomnakkus
2880 days ago
|
|
I think you're missing the point that this is a type of ratchet in getting the intermediates to stop doing arbitrary traffic shaping/queueing/etc. (Ideally it would end up being a ratchet for net neutrality, but let's see...) A lot of Chrome traffic is already QUIC-based[1], and I think people will be pissed off it their experience is suddenly degraded because some asshole ISP decided to wholesale drop UDP over TCP. Regardless of any of that -- the only way forward for privacy is end-to-end encryption and QUIC helps achieve that, up to "secret key availability"[2]. [1] I think Firefox is also experimenting with it? [2] That is, any entity serving you a page must have the right secret keys. This is basically the case with SSL-only web sites already. |
|