|
|
|
|
|
|
by subhobroto
2889 days ago
|
|
|
> If states actually wanted to address the costs of defensive medicine, they would do something like create affirmative defenses for doctors who adhered to certain established testing protocols. Not a bad suggestion but resolving regulatory overhead by instituting regulation is a bit, suboptimal, IMHO. The better solution is to reduce costs of the tests themselves: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17620197 In the software world, we have enjoyed significant productivity boost using Git/Hg/FOSSIL vs. CVS/SVN. Branching in CVS/SVN was so expensive that people rarely do it. It takes me 2 seconds to branch in Git/Hg/FOSSIL |
|
|