|
|
|
|
|
|
by bartbutler
2889 days ago
|
|
|
1. We do support IMAP and SMTP, via the bridge. 2. We don't believe such compulsion would be legal and would fight it in court. 3. Yes, this is a security promise not a verifiable guarantee. As I said though, our incentives for this are correct. We would love more than anything for all email to be encrypted already. Signal and Wire require trust-on-first-use. There's always some small degree of trust, and the smaller the better. Given the reality of unencrypted email, this is the best we (and anyone else) can do. Whether you are comfortable with it is up to you and your threat model. |
|
|
Do I need to repeat why I'm not going to take this argument yet again?
>We don't believe such compulsion would be legal and would fight it in court
Good to hear, but you should still be honest about the limitations in your approach. Secure systems are not built around trust and ones that are should not be advertised as such.