[toasterlovin]

I pay Apple to use iOS, so I want them to maintain 100% control over iOS as a platform. If I wanted a balkanized platform, I would buy an Android. I don’t say that to disparage Android, btw. I think the desire you expressed is completely valid. It is just very much not what I want.

[jrockway]

But I mean... if you don't want to use a web browser with a third party rendering engine, you could just not install it. I don't want to play Flappy Bird, so I didn't install it. Apple would have allowed me to, however. I don't see the difference.

As other comments mention, all a mandatory browser leads to is "you must use IE6 to visit this site" which was a very terrible world to live in. It isn't happening now simply because there are more !iOS devices than iOS devices.

[toasterlovin]

> If you don't want to use a web browser with a third party rendering engine, you could just not install it.

It's not that I don't want to use a 3rd party web browser. It's that I don't want a 3rd party web browser to ever become popular enough to give that browser's vendor the ability to influence Apple's ability to make technical decisions about their platform. Being beholden to 3rd party software vendors was basically the story of OS X for years. I don't think it was good for Apple.

> As other comments mention, all a mandatory browser leads to is "you must use IE6 to visit this site"

On the contrary, as long as Apple is Safari only and Android is mostly Chrome, there is no way that this can happen.

[greggman]

it is happening now. If iOS Safari doesn't support something its basically no go period. other browsers even on other platforms are effected because web developers can't use the new apis given that 20% of the market has zero choice.