|
|
|
|
|
by notender
2884 days ago
|
|
With technical debt, each new feature now costs $nx where n is the multiplier for the accrued technical debt. A feature that you need in 2 months to support a market shift now needs 4 months to complete due to technical debt. The issue with this oversimplified formula is that you cant accurately determine which debt affects which features. For some features it could be zero, and others it could be 100. However, I do agree that all teams should be carrying an amount of technical debt to be healthy. It shows a certain quality of decision making to balance it well. All too often though it becomes an excuse to procrastinate and that might as well be gambling. |
|
The additional complexity and work that comes with tech debt is the interest you pay on it.