|
|
|
|
|
by AstralStorm
2886 days ago
|
|
You have to at least account for differences in base rate of accidents.
The typical normalisation would take at least published accident total to synthesise data for the other cars.
(By using sales numbers of cars.) What he did there is statistically unacceptable. The medical equivalent would be to compare side effect profile of current best of line treatment done in general populace to results to your new treatment's phase 1 trial results which is done in healthy people only.
Then advertise that. Regardless, can we have the raw data please? Are the rates even meaningful when the incident counts are low? Vehicle years are not the right unit as this counts cars that are not being driven. Actual range driven is the right unit. |
|
That one local death in NL, the guy did double the allowed speed on a stretch where I can hardly hit 20% above the allowed speed accounting for traffic lights and local situation. The one Tesla death with the young kid, the same. Don't put maximum traction hundreds of HP in male hands. We tend to use it (sometimes).