Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by duskwuff 2889 days ago
Mostly correct, except for a few points:

1. RDP2 completely disables the debug interface. The microcontroller doesn't respond to debug requests in this mode.

2. As the third attack requires the microcontroller to have a working debug port, it requires it to be in RDP1. (Which could be accomplished using the second attack.)

1 comments

Ah, you're correct. I did think it was odd that they were able to make the debugger do anything in RDP2, but I misread it. That attack was indeed performed in RDP1.