[tranchms]

How do they know if what they’ve taken is actually LSD-25, and not some research chemical?

Research chemicals pawned off as LSD is more common than ever. They are dangerous psychotic inducing deugs.

[WalterGR]

How do they know if what they’ve taken is actually LSD-25, and not some research chemical?

Anyone who has become an ‘acid casualty’ was dosed with these dangerous research chemicals, and everyone who was just fine had legitimate LSD?

[sev]

Are you suggesting that’s impossible or improbable given the prevalence of fake LSD as well as research chemicals being sold as LSD-25?

[WalterGR]

My implicit suggestion was that the viewpoint expressed in my comment (as a question) is a ridiculous logical fallacy.

Reading the other comments I see that others have expressed the same thought.

[erikpukinskis]

It’s a hypothesis.

[acct1771]

Test kits, test kits, test kits, TEST KITS. This whole thread needs test kits.

[prolikewh0a]

I heard LSD is rarely synthesized now and instead people end up with research chemicals (now scheduled) like 2C-B instead. Do you know if this is true?

[juskrey]

True. In fact chances you're buying LSD nowadays is almost zero. And I suspect this is the reason of many bad experiences described in this topic

[collyw]

Where do you get that information from? What are people taking when we see articles on HN talk about the benefits of micro dosing?

[tpm]

It's not. There are reliable LSD vendors on the dark markets.