|
|
|
|
|
by ryrobes
2887 days ago
|
|
People want viable services not "tech". Red flag: both their concept as well as name have YT's brand name in it. The equivalent of calling your company "Uber for X". I'm all for decentralization where it makes sense - but this seems like they might be shooting themselves in the foot everywhere EXCEPT the tech (which, ultimately won't matter if they fail). From the article: "Online since March 2018 in a beta version, the project should definitely take off by October, based on the money raised." Beta + $60k + 6 more months time = Success? Against a practical content monopoly. As a guy currently doing the start-up dance - this kind of optimistic naivety almost offends me. |
|