|
|
|
|
|
by vertere
2899 days ago
|
|
Both well-defined protocols and vaguer design/architectural principles have their place. But is it a great idea to take a bunch of such principles and bundle them up under a (confusing) name? Perhaps not. It seems to me that the initial popularity of "REST" was largely because it wasn't SOAP (and didn't have to be XML), but it was still a name you could give what you were doing that made it sound like you were following some sort of standard. |
|
It's not hard, but I see very few differences between them. SOAP is easier to read/edit, JSON has less overhead/data, and REST...well, nobody could decide what REST was, so they just made it up or ignored it.