|
|
|
|
|
|
by sandworm101
2900 days ago
|
|
|
Read the actual case, not the review of it. I suspect the judge is relying upon the fact that the money was not paid in one lump sum. It is reasonable to believe that later payment constituted an acceptance of those new agreements, that they should apply to past monies too. |
|
|
That's not reasonable