|
|
|
|
|
by thaumasiotes
2895 days ago
|
|
> You're not going to find a statistical approach that will account for the subtleties that led to this outcome. The problem with soccer stats in general is that everything hinges on low-frequency events based on subtle differences of timing and space. I think this deserves to be elaborated a bit: a game in which 1 is a good score, and often a game-winning score, is never going to be accurately predicted based on a statistical approach, because scoring is too rare for a statistical approach to work well. Low scores mean that individual games have an extremely large element of chance. Imagine one team is about 4% better than another team; they should be favored about 51-49 to score a point. If a game scored 300 points, that difference would be perceptible within one game. But to resolve the same difference accurately in games that score 3 points each takes many, many, many games. |
|