|
|
|
|
|
by geocar
2897 days ago
|
|
That's about it. The theory is that if you put your server behind a popular CDN, then a state-level attacker is left with little choice but to block the entire server. Another benefit is that attacks that can observe but not modify traffic will be less able to track what sites you're visiting. There are risks though: * It's unclear how resistant CDNs actually are to state-level attackers. * It's unclear how resistant CDNs are to regular attackers[1] * Corporations/Security-savvy users will find it difficult to control what [their] workstations can reach and cannot: Allowing access to a single cloud-based service may inadvertently allow access to a malicious command/control server sharing the CDN. [1]: https://9to5mac.com/2017/02/24/cloudflare-server-breach-clou... |
|