|
|
|
|
|
by toomuchtodo
2903 days ago
|
|
It doesn’t have to be storage backed at every hour if the day. ComEd in Northern Illinois provides me nuclear at 1 cent per kWh from midnight to 5am because demand is so low in the middle of the night. You can overbuild renewables, and ramp battery production to arrive at a cost below nuclear, coal, and natural gas (and even used load shedding and coordinated storage orchestration using electric vehicles). Maybe I’m just optimistic based on historical cost decline curves, but I’d bet $1000 on my thread thesis (renewables replace all fossil generation by 2030). It’s the economics. |
|
Stop talking about wind and solar prices and just look at the price of batteries. They aren't on the trajectory you are projecting. It's hard enough to get them cost competitive for a single house, let alone industries with massive 24/7 consumption (e.g. electric mine shovels).