[smt88]

You didn't say it was the only way. You said:

> "The best way we know to create more smart people is to encourage smart people to have more children"

...which is also unsupported by current intelligence research and still relevant to my counterargument.

[danieltillett]

Actually we know that intelligence is mostly genetic (especially at the high end), but even if it isn’t, the family environment provided by (most) intelligent parents is very conducive to raising intelligent children.

It doesn’t matter the means (environment or genetic) as both will contribute to smart parents raising smart children (provided they have children).

[smt88]

Socioeconomic status is far, far more important than genes[1]. If you want more smart people, give people more money.

1. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/under-the-influence/...

[danieltillett]

That is not what the article says, nor what the science on this topic says either [0]. Read the section on Heritability and socioeconomic status.

0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ

[fjsolwmv]

Of you give dumb people more money, they will get swindled by smart people.

[tcbawo]

I don't know if we need more smart parents or rather caring/nurturing families. You don't have to be smart, but children of dysfunctional families are at a disadvantage for breaking the cycle.

[danieltillett]

Well we certainly need fewer dysfunctional families, but if we want more smart people we need to encourage more smart people to become parents.