[coldtea]

>Well there are more Haskell jobs than rust here, so I wouldn’t say more mainstream.

Only inside the echo bubble of Haskell.

Rust can be put to use in any place, without advertising it for it even -- and already powers widely used code across the world (and not just in Mozilla).

Haskell use mostly concerns a few financial institutions...

[empthought]

> Haskell use mostly concerns a few financial institutions

...who somehow have more resources to employ programmers than the organizations using Rust. Funny, that...

[coldtea]

Do they? Or did they just had a head-start and aren't going anywhere booming further soon?

It's not like all the financial sector runs on Haskell or something -- the majority uses the usual culprits. The stories behind these organisations that I've read of is of some opinionated PM going in and making Haskell or OcamL and the like the officially supported language -- in Jane Street and Standard Chartered and the like. Which is the definition of being an outlier choice.

So, yeah, they are "more programmers" wanted for those 20+ and 30+ year languages, compared to a merely 3 year old language (Rust 1.0 was released in 2015).

But nowhere near the momentum.

Rust has been used already by Dropbox, Canonical, Cloudflare, Atlassian, Microsoft (Azure), Chef, Mozzila (of course), and tons of others in backend and client code. And that's in 3 years, and while the language is changing and core libs are still being built.

And it's silly to judge by job postings, as those places don't need to advertise for specific Rust roles (they can get regular systems programmers or use their own existing devs and have them do Rust). It's not a huge paradigm shift like with Haskell where you'll need people with that kind of training already. Besides, Rust is so new, there would be little point asking for Rust devs explicitly.