[spruciefic399]

To be consistent, you'd have to leverage your arguments against other fields with replication crises, which include neuroscience and oncology. It's really true of the biomedical sciences in general.

Psychology has a history of being sort of self-analytical (which makes sense if you're a field studying human behavior). Meta-analysis, for example, was largely incubated in psychology before it started expanding into other disciplines.

The criticism I'm aware of is really being leveled at the idea that this is somehow unique to psychology. It's like killing the messenger, or someone who is trying to fix the problem.