[ofrzeta]

I can see that but I can also see that there's an air tank mounted on the outside of the submarine. This could probably be taken off while passing the narrow passage.

On the other hand you would need to squeeze a person in that submarine over the whole diving range. That would probably not help feeling them more comfortable.

Last not least in article you will find the quote "'The equipment he gave us is not practical for our mission,' Narongsak said Tuesday morning", that might prove my point.

Finally I don't get why you are arguing that the submarine is such a great idea when it's clearly not.

[mehrdadn]

> This could probably be taken off while passing the narrow passage.

> That would probably not help feeling them more comfortable.

> that might prove my point.

All this doubt in your assessment and all of a sudden you deduce their plan is "bollocks"?

> I don't get why you are arguing that the submarine is such a great idea

Where did I argue a submarine is a great idea? Why must something either be "bollocks" or "a great idea"?