|
|
|
|
|
by deltateam
2897 days ago
|
|
"goodput" -you pay less for an order
-it takes less time for your order to get filled
-more efficient pricing
-liquidity ripples out into risk management products derived from thick order books
-easier to manage risk
-lower cost of transaction "badput" -hard to compete against the liquidity providers
-they have unparalleled view of order flow, which runs counter to a market with fair equal access to information |
|
So prices are some pennies more efficient, but some of the trading money is going to the pockets of high frequency traders.
This is good! To a point. Eventually the price tag of improved liquidity could be higher than the value of that liquidity.