[kalkut]

You really are helpful and you try to fix this so I really want to say yes but I am currently grinding for my own startup so I know that a lot of time will pass before I actually do it so I don't promise anything.

A good way to test it would be to make a simple websocket server that simulate n users each sending n' fake xyz position and rotation data per second. This data updates a Redux store in a React app made with Aframe (HTML wrapper around ThreeJS). You make n cubes move and rotate along the data in the store. Compare the fps you get against the fps you get with a vanilla solution. Also check what happens on the performance tab of chrome

I am able to recognize that my use case is very specific. I used React/Redux/Reselect and Aframe/ThreeJS with sockets a year ago. Now I kept React but the rest of the stack have changed for nearly a year

[acemarke]

Gotcha. I've made a note of this in https://github.com/reactjs/react-redux/pull/898 for future reference.

If you ever do have some free time to throw together an example app that demonstrates this behavior, please feel free to link it in that issue, or ping me directly (Twitter and Reactiflux are usually best).

[kalkut]

I ended up hacking a benchmark. I couldn't beat that itch !

I mentioned it in the pull request, here it is : https://github.com/Kalkut/redux-data-frequency-benchmark