|
|
|
|
|
|
by ChrisLomont
2907 days ago
|
|
|
>and entirely supports my description of the disparate impact standards When it impacts protected classes. >unlawful in the particular circumstances because of the absence of proof of business necessity Yep, and we're discussing jobs where IQ correlates to performance, so once again, do you claim in such jobs IQ testing is not legal? All case law I've read supports using IQ or other cognitive testing in such cases. Do you have a case otherwise? If not, then this entire thread is moot. We're going around in circles. |
|
|