[glitcher]

I'm more surprised that such a "promise" is given any credibility in court to begin with. I'm not familiar with the law, but from my naive understanding a company can basically decide to change their pricing however/whenever they want. So how does stating to a judge that they might have an opportunity to lower prices at some point in the unknown future translate into any kind of legal obligation to do so? To me it just sounds like an empty promise that got them through the court proceedings, and in no way affected their behavior afterwards because why would it?