|
|
|
|
|
by krapp
2911 days ago
|
|
True, but no one ever claimed (or should claim) that Star Trek was "hard" sci-fi. At best, it sometimes tried, depending on the writer, to make nods to actual science. The original series seemed to have input from actual engineers and scientists, which is why you have the nacelles separated (to protect from radiation) and Bussard collectors, but then as time went on, it sort of became magic particles and subspace and not even bothering with the pretense. |
|