|
|
|
|
|
by kls
5739 days ago
|
|
I tend to remember that period as search really sucked, Webcrawler, Lycos and the rest where really bad. Alta Vista was the best and it was only the leader by a thin margin. Anyway, From the day Google hit the market, and their searches actually returning something even remotely close to what you where looking for seemed like voodoo. Google exceeded the "remotely" part by usually hitting the nail on the head. Given the fact that their algorithm was not known it was not being manipulated like people try to do today. Search results where actually better back then then they are today. Anyway to get to the point, I don't think there where too many people that thought Google was going to be anything short of "the" search engine. At lest those at the grassroot level. I think this is the case of a executive dismissing the technical merit of a competitors product, when the other offerings where so abominable that technical merit counted. When things are close you can win out on branding but this was a case of the buggy companies not seeing the horseless carriage decimating their market while the guy on the street could see the advantage of the new offering clearly. |
|
If that was the case, someone would have snatched them up, especially given the ridiculous valuations companies were getting in 1999.