[psetq]

It's still an extremely interesting article imo.

I sometimes read hn as the discussions here can add to articles on topics I find interesting but have limited knowledge on, but the 3+ top comment threads (so far) discussing the title and not content of this article is somewhat disappointing.

[decebalus1]

I'm sorry you feel disappointed. But do you also feel like you've been bamboozled? Because this is how I feel after reading the whole article thinking that somebody managed to refute the 'simulation hypotheses'. Interesting article, of course, but I would have not read it at all if the titles was accurate. So I feel bamboozled.