I'd expect that to have nearly all the disadvantages of cloud (other than virtualization).
One is still locked into the provider's pricing structure.
One is still locked into the provider's ISP choices.
One is still locked into the provider's internal network architecture choices.
One is still locked into the provider's limited hardware choices.
The last one is the biggest one, if only because there are so many opportunities in so many components to maximize performance and minimize cost, with a little forethought and customization, all while staying well within the commodity market. The "one size fits all" model does many people a disservice.
This is especially true even at fairly low scale, where the issue of obtaining certain components in large volumes doesn't come into play.
I understand why some people insist it's just too hard to deal with hardware, but I find it disingenuous to advocate that opnion without at least a more comprehensive understanding of what modern, commodity hardware is capable of. I think most of the claims of difficulty are coming from those without this knowledge and have primarily software backgrounds (and are relying on hearsay or other second-hand experience).
Most providers I have seen that rent hardware offer unlimited customization when it come to the box you are renting. Network architecture would obviously be off the table though.
One is still locked into the provider's pricing structure.
One is still locked into the provider's ISP choices.
One is still locked into the provider's internal network architecture choices.
One is still locked into the provider's limited hardware choices.
The last one is the biggest one, if only because there are so many opportunities in so many components to maximize performance and minimize cost, with a little forethought and customization, all while staying well within the commodity market. The "one size fits all" model does many people a disservice.
This is especially true even at fairly low scale, where the issue of obtaining certain components in large volumes doesn't come into play.
I understand why some people insist it's just too hard to deal with hardware, but I find it disingenuous to advocate that opnion without at least a more comprehensive understanding of what modern, commodity hardware is capable of. I think most of the claims of difficulty are coming from those without this knowledge and have primarily software backgrounds (and are relying on hearsay or other second-hand experience).