|
|
|
|
|
by luffy
5738 days ago
|
|
First off, I love F#. I use it extensively for offline data processing, managing our build process (via FAKE), and general purpose Windows scripting. I've also dabbled in DSL creation, and if you follow any of examples it really is pretty easy to do. As Don Syme (F#'s creator) has said, F# is a lot like a statically typed Python (with lots more syntax). But I wouldn't use it with ASP.NET. Learning F# is pretty heady and it would give your average .NET developer fits to learn it. You'd lose an advantage of using the .NET platform then - it's pretty easy to get average developers to be productive in .NET/C#. Forcing developers to learn F# would grind productivity to a halt. Also, because of the whitespace requirements, F# is lousy in the webforms view engine. (Perhaps a Mako-like templating engine for F# would make sense). Stick with C# for your web work and your libraries that your web site are using. Life will be easier. If you really want to delve into F# on the web, these guys did a framework designed to be used with F#:
http://www.bistroframework.org/ They also did a .NET port of the django templating engine:
http://ndjango.org/ |
|
The largest contention point arises when we pass F#-ish types to the ASPX page for rendering. It works, it's just that the C# required at that point can be sort of ugly.
Also, don't forget WebSharper, which provides a way to write all your client-side code (JavaScript) in F#. It handles all sorts of things, including async RPC calls. http://www.intellifactory.com/products/wsp/Home.aspx