|
|
|
|
|
by perl4ever
2917 days ago
|
|
Monopoly and coercion are an essential part of regulation. You need regulation for the things you can't verify. I can only repeat myself in saying information (as opposed to data) is a public good and systematically undermining its production by government is bound to be catastrophic. Every criticism of how government works should lead us to say "let's fix government" not "let's get rid of government". Libertarians are like fish who want to abolish water because it seems to impede swimming...or a brain that wants to eliminate the heart because of its monopoly on pumping blood. |
|
What do you mean by this? Everything not understood should be prohibited, with exceptions provided by a centralized gatekeeper?
This goes against 500 years of Englightment Thought. It's total subservience to Big Brother, and total naivety about what that kind of centralization of power results in.
>>Libertarians are like fish who want to abolish water because it seems to impede swimming...
With the exception of a tiny minority of libertarians who are anarchists, the vast majority of libertarians do not want to abolish government. Yet opponents of libertarianism regularly attack this strawman as if it addresses libertarian arguments.
There is a time and a place for the government, but it is not in restricting voluntary interactions between consenting adults.