[jasode]

> it's just regular journalism,

I did not intend "brain dump" to be a negative criticism but to explain further what the _full_ text article is about. It's a mishmash of various unrelated topics and I was hoping my clarification would encourage readers to look at the rest of the article.

>Such things frequently cover multiple topics under different subheadings.

Yes, this is why I took the trouble to paste all 7 subtopics/subtitles -- so readers can quickly see that.

The article's prominent title is only 1/7th of the whole story and the gp's summary is incomplete and may unintentionally steer potential readers away from the other 6/7ths of the text. (E.g. the section about Jack Dorsey doubling the stock price and the section about "data science" being the new knowledge baseline -- has nothing to do with the section about corporate police enforcing laws against Chinese shell companies.)