|
|
|
|
|
|
by perl4ever
2924 days ago
|
|
|
It's not a genetic test, and it isn't a test for something that defines autism, so you're begging the question IMO. Sure, human observers are imperfect, but that doesn't mean you can choose an arbitrary test that is precise and make it the standard just because. "We need something better than human judgement, and this is something, thus it is better" |
|
|