|
|
|
|
|
by asfasgasg
2917 days ago
|
|
The people affected by these types of housing situations (except those in China) are generally wealthy, even by first world standards. Referring them as indentured slaves (not a thing, by the way -- there are indentured servants, and slaves) is unreasonable. |
|
I was making a point, akin to "wage slave".
Just because you entered a contract doesn't mean you weren't coerced into it (the inverse is the perennial argument of those OK with no minimal wage and sweatshop labor).