|
|
|
|
|
by AstralStorm
2921 days ago
|
|
There is but one risk which USA has seen in the past. When the company owns your living space, there is even stronger pressure on you to stay there, be productive and accept lower wages.
When it also owns your food source, the threat is even greater.
The result would be replacement of wages with "benefits" such as living. Technical indentured servitude also known as soft slavery. Technically you could move, except you cannot ever possibly afford to. Additional stress would be put on people not in this arrangement as they would potentially have to spend more money to get at the same level. (Albeit there could be less pressure in the housing market.) The next step in this slippery slope would be inheritance. Since company owns everything, your kids inherit little. Either that, or they inherit a position... Welcome to actual indentured servitude again. Company branded kids straight out of a few known dystopias. Mostly because moving is a special kind of hell, especially with kids. Communities cannot form either way. Some people like it, they're a minority though as far as I know. |
|