|
|
|
|
|
by ComradeTaco
2926 days ago
|
|
Okay, my bachelors was in civil engineering and I have worked in construction and engineering for just over two years now. Most public projects today have generous structured incentives that are given to companies for meeting goals for time and budget. We work to these incentives. Keep in mind that often you cannot be aware of the things that will go wrong until you actually do them. This happens in software development quite a bit. I am not aware of any extensive private tunnel construction that has occurred without public financing inside of the U.S. So here are the drawbacks to Musk's plan: 1. He may prioritize speed over safety, either unintentionally causing loss of life or limb because of construction practices or geotechnically destablize the foundations of the buildings and infrastructure that he's traveling under. 2. I firmly believe that it's going to cost far, far more than 1 billion. That leaves the chance of a big hole in the ground that may eventually fill with water. |
|
The craziest part is that there is already a much cheaper and not that much slower option to get to the airport. This project seems rather Quixotic.