[pwinnski]

Stating that a headline doesn't match an article is a different claims from stating that an article fails to be convincing.

One can disagree with the case they're making. But the headline was (now changed here): "Comcast disabled throttling system, proving data cap is just a money grab." The article covers both the fact that Comcast has disabled their throttling system, and why the writer thinks the remaining data cap is a money-grab.

Whether you agree that the data caps are money-grabs or not is completely irrelevant to whether the headline is (was) appropriate. Your argument seems to be with the article, not the headline.

The headline is like the label on box, and your argument seems to be with the contents of the box.