Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ComradeTaco 2931 days ago
The article claims service every 15 minutes during most of the day, which means it will be extremely unprofitable to build.

This isn't meant to return it's investment, it's meant as an operational testbed for musk's vision.

2 comments

The 30 second figure is from The Boring Company:

> Electric skates will leave each station as frequently as every 30 seconds. The Chicago Express Loop will operate 20 hours per day, every day of the week.

Source: https://www.boringcompany.com/chicago/

Ahh, I appreciate the correction!

I thought they were going to have a single track tunnel with passing sidings based on the 1.6 billion dollar construction costs, which would limit frequency.

Does Musk seriously believe he get two ~20 mile tunnels and terminals for $1.6 billion? I don't know if he's exceedingly ambitious or delusional, give that a underground that's depicted in the rendering would cost 1/4 of his budget.

That $1.6 billion was my back of the envelope estimate based on costs I found in the news. Apparently, there is a unnamed source quoted in the Tribune that the cost would be under $1 billion. Also, these skates are the width of an electric car, so one tunnel 28 feet wide should suffice for bidirectional traffic.
If your goal was to cut costs and your largest single expense was boring, you would choose two 14' bores over a single 28' bore, because a 28' bore has a cross section twice as large as the combined cross section of two 14' bores and variable costs for boring are roughly based on cross sectional area

One of the only things that I can agree with Musk in regards to this project is that larger tunnels are more expensive.

Wouldn't you need a third tunnel for emergency escape / access?
If they can really do it for that price, that’s impressive. In London one of the tube lines is being extended by 3.2km and it will cost $1.6b (£1.2b):

https://www.london.gov.uk//press-releases/mayoral/nle-tunnel...

London is relatively easy to tunnel in, and as it’s an extension existing rolling stock will be used (so no development or purchase costs).

The RFQ required that, but with only 8-16 people per vehicle, they'd have to go much more often to have any reasonable throughput.