|
|
|
|
|
|
by xentronium
5739 days ago
|
|
|
1. "Never said it did prevent CSRF" -- probably should have clarified. 2. You're arguing about semantics. CSRF is a security issue. Being able to send updates without user's knowledge is a security hole too. Backed up by a wrong behaviour if you wish. I should never forget that HN is a Serious Business. None of the above mentioned makes twitter guys any less lame. |
|
|