[tomxor]

Ah, thanks for pointing that out. But I wonder if there is actually a demonstrable exploit for that patch? Or, if it's the same preemptive approach? I guess i'm arguing that patches didn't necessarily wait for Theo's talk to reveal why they are doing what they are doing.

Can someone with deep enough knowledge of the patch tell if it implicitly demonstrates the flaw? (and therefor effectively breaks public disclosure) or is it purely speculative - oh god the puns are killing me.