|
|
|
|
|
by slx26
2934 days ago
|
|
You are right, but in my opinion the page/writer completely fails when they don't explain and clearly state that the possibility of "correlation =/= causation" exists. And it fails because we lose 80% of the people to blind belief towards what the article says, and from the other 20%, 15% are saying "correlation =/= causation", and a 4% like you are saying in response: "sure, but that's something we need to investigate to tell". I understand that the balance between science and selling the science is hard, but it can be done, and imho they could be doing it better. |
|