|
|
|
|
|
by TeMPOraL
2933 days ago
|
|
Yes. It's the most cost-effective solution, because: - we haven't figured out how to make companies care about "delivering value" part of the "delivering value in exchange for money" work, and - we allow them to dump externalities on users without consequences or compensation. So the most cost-effective solution in this scheme will be a half-assed product that's barely good enough to be sellable, and which makes my computer use more electricity while being less capable of running software simultaneously. |
|