|
|
|
|
|
by piketty_fan
2930 days ago
|
|
I disagree about the pie-in-the-sky-ness but that's a fair thing to disagree about and I don't see myself being able to convince you otherwise on a messageboard. what I don't see as fair is pretending that there is such a thing as forcefully removing large amounts of impoverished people (who ostensibly do not have better options) from the country as being possible in a way that doesn't result in large amounts of deaths (either from our police state or from the conditions that caused them to emigrate in the first place, conditions that have, incidentally, been primarily caused by american empire). I also don't think that, given the nature of our law enforcement, it won't be the case that the additional enforcement of these laws isn't just going to be used to disrupt labor organizing or political action that tries to decrease the amount of power held by capital. I agree that pretending there's a gray area only helps the rich but I disagree that enforcing laws that are fundamentally broken and that primarily exist to serve capital is a viable solution either. I have no problem with reformist solutions, but there's no worker-friendly way to arbitrarily deport workers that's an intermediate to a future that's good for anyone but the rich |
|
I just wanted to make the point that there were straightforward arguments about undocumented immigration and that none of them really intersect with the wall. :)