|
|
|
|
|
by oldcynic
2929 days ago
|
|
Not saying it's done with malice aforethought, but it's a known and common pattern. I've done it myself with Amazon Prime and other things where I took a few months longer than I should have to actually go cancel it. Some will let things lie far longer. If a service is worthless without the online component, Netflix for instance, a sub is clearly the answer and I'll pay gladly. For an editor, utility or IDE having an online account is usually, for me at least, a minor benefit at best when I'll put my files in iCloud, dropbox or git. You made it a tougher sell as you want a rolling commitment. £50 as a one off? I'll spend that on a whim, then probably upgrade in a couple of years. Most examples I've seen of companies switching to a subscription model end up with a subscription that's more than the previous licence cost. Unless it's something your career or business depends on few would buy every major release widening the real differential further. That we're having this conversation on a post about a "cash cow sales model" says it all don't you think? It simply starts to look like "we'd like more money from you". |
|
And yes, "cash cow" seems a little uncouth in light of that discussion, haha.