|
|
|
|
|
|
by buvanshak
2939 days ago
|
|
|
>You clearly don't know what deduce means. Please explain. >You've also clearly haven't understood anything I've said during this entire conversation. Oh I understood you just fine. I just find it stupid. >You've utterly failed to establish that they are lying. That is because you are overly generous with assumptions to justify their claims, which is typical of people who are apologetic of fraudulent entities such as Musk >Tesla already has an established history... But they haven't save the planet yet. Please give some thought about what you are writing before responding. |
|
|
No, I actually conceded. I gave up the generous assumptions on safety, backed by data, because you claimed we couldn't generalize from that data and I agree that doing such a generalization would be in some ways misleading.
This is what I mean by a lack of understanding on your part. Even in the post where you are telling me that you understood me just fine, but find my ideas to be stupid, you don't actually address what I'm saying.
As a consequence, I'm not going to continue this conversation. Have a nice day.