|
|
|
|
|
by hota_mazi
2936 days ago
|
|
That won't work, because the actual disk inside the sleeve will never be aligned the same way your copy is. The protection is not the hole in the sleeve, it's the hole in the disk. For example, the garbage reads would happen on track 12, $230 bytes after the $D5 $AA $96 marker. Good luck physically reproducing this. These protections are trivial to remove in code, though. |
|
And having made multiple copies like that, I know very well it worked pretty well as a method -- it's very likely why that method never became the 'uncopiable' it was claimed to be when it came out.