Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by matwood 2937 days ago
> In went the media card.

So these pros were all using SD cards and not CF cards? Not defending Apple, but putting in an SD card slot never made any sense to me because at that time the high end cameras often used CF cards. It also made an assumption that SD cards were never going to change. Plus, it wasted space for people who never needed to plug in some media card.

I would have much rather Apple added another USB connection in that space because it would have had much more flexibility.

4 comments

A full page spread in a mass printed magazine like People is about 6 to 8 megapixels, i.e. they don't need to use the full 18 to 24 or more megapixels; most likely they crop heavily.

The CF cards are more expensive per megabyte and less compatible than SD cards.

Many pros shoot SD cards and never reuse them, giving themselves a backup just by copying the pics to their laptop and keeping the cards.

Since it’s a laptop, wouldn’t it make more sense to target more of a serious-casual type audience, and therefore use SD cards? The professionals who are more likely to use CF cards would be more likely to have a dedicated desktop for it.
My memory's had a bit longer to cook/regurgitate. Maybe they used a cable. If so (I am uncertain), sorry for my mis-recollection.

I would still worry about the keyboard situation.

“At the time”? The 5D mark IV still has dual CF/SD slots, with CFast being the highest-performance alternative available