|
|
|
|
|
by Zenbit_UX
2935 days ago
|
|
Physics and thermodynamics don't actually use $ costs in their equations... e$ !== mc2 The costs you are referring to are in energy. It's entirely possible that the $ cost to put it back into the ground are cheaper than to get it out. |
|
Except here we can put it into storage in a more convenient place.
The real problem is that we do not have enough energy to run this yet. A bunch of nuclear plants would solve it but these come with political baggage. Unfortunately CO2 recovery is very local.