| Hi, I have a couple of questions: If I understand correctly, as far as we thought there seem to be 3 flavours of neutrino (electron, muon, tau neutrinos), and neutrinos carry (kinetic) energy (and possibly some rest mass). Historically often "different" or "new" particles just turned out to be the same particle with different energy: Cathode rays and electrons are the same thing, but nobody would describe the electron in hydrogen as a cathode ray orbitinng the proton. Beta rays also turned out to be electrons, and similarily nobody describes the electron in hydrogen to be a beta ray orbiting the proton. X-rays and gamma-rays are both photons, yet initially we did not know they were the same particle, just higher kinetic ennergy. Now my question: how do we know the neutrino flavours aren't really the same particle but in some kind of different state, causing them to be differentially absorbed/detected? consider red and blue light photons and pigments, the red light would only be absorbed by the blue pigment, and the blue light woud only be absorbed by the red pigment, but does that mean they are different particles? How do we know a sterile neutrino isn't just one of the known neutrinos with little kinetic energy, or perhaps too much kinetic energy to interact? |
We know from experiments like LEP (electron-positron collisions) that there are only three kinds of neutrinos that participate in weak interactions (electron, muon, and tau). Thus the fourth neutrino type suggested by these anomalous oscillation measurements cannot interact via the weak force, meaning it doesn't interact at all,* hence sterile. The only way to detect them is through their influence on the oscillations of other neutrino types.
* They'd still feel gravity, which isn't included in the Standard Model anyway.