|
|
|
|
|
by tom_mellior
2938 days ago
|
|
> So pay the developer $20k per year or pay them $100k? If they bring you $20k worth of value, pay them $20k. If they bring you $100k worth of value, pay them $100k. Would it suck to be a developer in San Francisco on the same salary as your colleague in India? Sure, but nobody forces you to live in San Francisco. > If the latter, or anywhere between, then we'll just see developers move to the cheapest, lowest tax countries to arbitrage the artificial market inefficiency. So? What does that have to do with your company? Does it have a moral obligation to contribute to global inequality? Wouldn't it be better for the world if good hard money for taxes and locally sourced goods and services were flowing into less developed countries? |
|
Spoken like a person without a family or property who is fine with moving to India in a heartbeat.
Do you even know Indian culture? Languages? How to actually acquire a decent living place in there?
It is an existential risk. A pretty big one. You could end up on street or worse. Alleviating this risk takes negligible resources and quite a lot of time.