[rich-and-poor]

  I'm also interested in testing the Jaguar iPace. By most performance measures, its beaten the Model X. 

You are lying. The iPace is FAR behind the Model X in all performance measures. The iPace has a manufacturer's estimated range of ~350km, no EPA rated range given. The Model X has EPA rated maximum range of 475km - that's a third party verified range that is 125km above the estimated (and very optimistic) range of the iPace. As far as speed goes, iPace is 4.8s to 100km/h, while the P100D variant of the Model X is 0 - 100km/h in 3.6s, a solid second faster.

I don't know why you write such obviously wrong things. They are blatantly false and misleading. Don't write stuff that is blatantly wrong, you poison the internet along with the collective human consciousness.

[jameskegel]

I appreciate that someone is stable able to cast a critical view on those spreading non-facts. I hope this catches on.

[pxlpshr]

One of us is correct, depending on what the other is talking about. But "FAR behind" is a bit of a gross overstatement. I also don't understand your negativity except that it must be rooted in a love affair for Tesla/Elon.

When I said performance, this is the video I watched that compelled me to get interested in what Jaguar was doing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keWERJBfDPI

[rich-and-poor]

You are being fooled, they never show the backside of that Tesla Model X to reveal the battery size. They are also not really an independent third party

[SmellyGeekBoy]

A relative of mine who works for JLR was claiming that the iPace was better than the Model X in every way the other day too. He started reeling off figures that were blatantly inferior. I can only assume GP also works for them. It's a strange mindset over there.