|
|
|
|
|
by onli
2944 days ago
|
|
Good link. But I don't see how you can tolerate that contradiction. Either you agree with Oracle that the Java APIs were copyrighted and Google should not have been allowed to reconstruct them. Or you worry about fragmentation coming from an incompatible Java implementation. Doing both is nonsensical. |
|
Google should have paid Sun instead of playing a Microsoft's move fostering Sun's downfall, period.
And in doing so, Android would have been JavaSE compliant plus whatever additional libraries they would think to drop on top of it.